Accessibility Review Request for CSS Sizing Level 3 [css-sizing-3]

Hi APA Working Group,

CSS WG requests Accessibility review of CSS Sizing Module Level 3
   https://www.w3.org/TR/css-sizing-3/

This CSS module defines the various sizing properties and concepts used 
throughout CSS. New features since CSS2 are summarized in
   https://www.w3.org/TR/css-sizing-3/#changes-3

This specification is in the “almost CR” stage of development, so we expect it 
to transition, in more or less its current form, after completing horizontal 
review.

I don't expect accessibility to have much to say on any of this spec, except 
that as enabling better control over content-based sizing as we're doing here 
is good because it makes pages more robust to differing font choices. But in 
any case:

Please raise any issues in the csswg GitHub repo:
    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues
and let us know when you have completed your review.

Thanks!

= FAST Checklist =

If technology allows visual rendering of content:
* New keywords allow design of pages to more precisely use content-based 
sizing algorithms, which improves ability to create resizeable pages.
* No other concerns apply.

If technology provides author control over color:
No control over color.

If technology provides features to accept user input:
No features to accept user input.

If technology provides user interaction features:
No user interaction features.

If technology defines document semantics:
Does not define document structure or semantics.

If technology provides time-based visual media:
No time-based visual media.

If technology provides audio:
Does not provide audio.

If technology allows time limits:
No time limits.

If technology allows text content:
Does not provide or define text layout.

If technology creates objects that don't have an inherent text representation:
Doesn't create objects that aren't text.

If technology provides content fallback mechanisms, whether text or other formats:
No fallback mechanisms.

If technology provides visual graphics:
Does not provide graphics.

If technology provides internationalization support:
N/A

If technology defines accessible alternative features:
N/A

If technology provides content directly for end-users:
I don't think this section applies...

If technology defines an API:
No APIs defined.

If technology defines a transmission protocol:
No transmission protocols defined.

~fantasai

Received on Friday, 23 October 2020 19:57:05 UTC