- From: Dael Jackson <daelcss@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 19:14:48 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
=========================================
These are the official CSSWG minutes.
Unless you're correcting the minutes,
Please respond by starting a new thread
with an appropriate subject line.
=========================================
CSS Display Level 3
-------------------
- RESOLVED: Republish css-display-3 as CR
CSS Conditional Level 4
-----------------------
- RESOLVED: Publish css-conditional-4 as FPWD
- RESOLVED: Add emilio as an editor
===== FULL MINUTES BELOW ======
Agenda: https://wiki.csswg.org/planning/toronto-2019
CSS Display Level 3
===================
Scribe: TabAtkins
fantasai: Changes to Display module are: fixed some markup errors,
made some very minor changes to everything
fantasai: Copied over the dfn of "absolutely positioned" as a term,
so it's easier to ref
fantasai: And defined "parent box", which Oriol reviewed the dfn of.
fantasai: Main thing that's significant is "parent box" definition,
but that's not even much of a big deal.
<fantasai> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display/#css-parent-box
<fantasai> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display/issues-cr-2018
fantasai: There are a lot of minor editorial issues
fantasai: That's DoC, there were 8 issues
fantasai: I think we should republish, that would also help fix some
broken links.
<astearns> +1
Rossen: Does anyone need review time?
Rossen: Not hearing requests for additional time
Rossen: Objections to repubbing Display?
RESOLVED: Republish css-display-3 as CR
CSS Conditional Level 4
=======================
Scribe: fantasai
<fantasai> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-4/
emilio: It's a diff spec from Conditional 3 with @supports
selector() added
TabAtkins: Need to undiff the spec or it'll break bikeshed's indexes
astearns: haven't published diff specs for fwpd
fantasai: yes, we did for grid-2
florian: also ui-4
dbaron: Seems like we should fix bikeshed
<tabatkins> https://github.com/tabatkins/bikeshed/issues/957
TabAtkins: I don't like diff specs
TabAtkins: except as in-progress work
AmeliaBR: Diff specs are really easy to review
AmeliaBR: so prefer them for that reason
AmeliaBR: but don't want to break tools
florian: Could we temporarily publish as a diff spec?
TabAtkins: don't depend on my timing for that, unsure how long it
will take to fix
TabAtkins: publish full spec, maintain ED as a diff spec?
florian: Bikeshed doesn't get confused by diff EDs?
TabAtkins: does, but doesn't matter as much
astearns: there's like 5 sentences of new content?
dbaron: want a spec so we can ship implementations
astearns: fair enough
Rossen: ok, officially resolved
RESOLVED: Publish css-conditional-4 as FPWD
RESOLVED: Add emilio as an editor
Meeting closed.
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2019 23:15:49 UTC