- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 22:32:34 -0400
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Florian, box-sizing-001 : if I disable 'box-sizing: border-box' (therefore making the default 'box-sizing: content-box' to apply) in that test, then I would expect to see red to indicate failure. But this is not what happens. So, that test seems to me to be a case of can-not-fail kind of test. http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-ui-3_dev/nightly-unstable/html/box-sizing-001.htm box-sizing-003 test can not fail: it will never display red. There is a padding belt but there is no border belt in the test. I think the test should be using a border belt, and preferably (intentionally and deliberately) an asymetrical one. http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-ui-3_dev/nightly-unstable/html/box-sizing-003.htm box-sizing-005 never will display red. There is a padding belt but there is no border belt in the test. I think the test should be using a border belt, and preferably (intentionally and deliberately) an asymetrical one. http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-ui-3_dev/nightly-unstable/html/box-sizing-005.htm box-sizing-018 and box-sizing-019 can not fail as they are not really testing 'box-sizing: border-box'. There is no padding belt and no border belt. http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-ui-3_dev/nightly-unstable/html/box-sizing-018.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-ui-3_dev/nightly-unstable/html/box-sizing-019.htm Many box-sizing-[001-025] tests do not use any border belt on the tested elements. I would use one and try to use an asymetrical one. Gérard P.S. There are other issues with at least 3 other tests...
Received on Monday, 25 June 2018 02:33:04 UTC