- From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:37:27 +0000
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 11 June 2018 00:37:56 UTC
I think it’s not a a term requiring a definition, as it seems more like a mathematical property to me ("for any content, there exists a length starting from which more than one solution exists to the alignment constraints stated above”). This is the case when a top aligned box is for instance 1.5em and the “normal” line height would otherwise compute to 1.2em; sure the top aligned box will be at the top, but you still have a full 0.3em of height where you can place the baseline-aligned content. Do you align that content at the bottom (meaning the top-aligned box starts 0.3em above the line box, or do you start the line box at the top too, leaving the top-aligned box 0.3em taller at the bottom? I think that is the matter that doesn’t seem defined there. Not sure if this is defined in a further version of the spec. ________________________________ De : Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> Envoyé : Sunday, June 10, 2018 3:41:44 PM À : W3C Style Objet : [CSS22] 10.8 "tall enough" What is the definition of "tall enough", as used in item (2) of the prologue for 10.8 [1]. [1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#line-height
Received on Monday, 11 June 2018 00:37:56 UTC