- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 18:56:18 +0330
- To: Hr Gwea <hrg.wea@gmail.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 07/04/2016 12:58 AM, Hr Gwea wrote: > Ok, that reduces the duplication a bit, but still requires elem1 and elem2 to be named explicitly twice. Which is not > convenient when elem1 and elem2 are complex selectors. > > I was thinking of the possibility to pass parameters to the descendant combinator. > For example: > > elem1 >(3)> elem2 /*descendants up to third level*/ > elem1 >(2,5)> elem2 /*descendants from second to fifth level*/ > elem1 >(1)> elem2 /*same as child combinator*/ > > How do you like it? It's not an unreasonable proposal, but, unless it was a very common case, I don't think it would be worth the effort to add this to CSS given there's a usable solution for it already. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 1 January 2018 15:26:57 UTC