- From: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <kde@carewolf.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:39:14 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Cc: Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com>, OwN-3m-All <own3mall@gmail.com>
On Donnerstag, 22. Februar 2018 22:50:59 CET Ambrose LI wrote: > 2018-02-22 16:17 GMT-05:00 OwN-3m-All <own3mall@gmail.com>: > > I'm glad you are all experts on underlining (Is there even such a > > thing? If there is, that is pathetic)! Links have ALWAYS been > > underlined as best practice for web development. [stuff deleted] > > This is white supremacy. In some languages underlines are punctuation, > and underlining links is,technically speaking, grammatically wrong. > ?? What the... We are speaking about latin like text. For other types of text other ways of indicating links, but many parts of the CSS standards relate to latin-like text specifically and makes little or no sense in other scripts: Italic, sans- serif vs serif, upper-case/lower-case, floating ::first-letter, ligatures, kerning, and I could keep going. In fact most of is *cough* "white supremecy", or perhaps better put, the parts dealing with latin-like text rendering are mainly dealing with latin-like text rendering. 'Allan
Received on Monday, 26 February 2018 23:39:46 UTC