- From: Brad Czerniak <ao5357@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:29:50 -0500
- To: OwN-3m-All <own3mall@gmail.com>
- Cc: Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:30:47 UTC
Another non-member chiming in here with some fun background: IIUC, a big push for text-decoration-skip-ink includes a popular medium design post <https://medium.design/crafting-link-underlines-on-medium-7c03a9274f9> about their work with underlines, which was spurred on by a change to Chrome <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=338148>. One important argument for skipping descenders by default is that it's more accessible for users with dyslexia and other differing abilities (3-7% of any given user base): https://medium.com/@iamhiwelo/improving-text-readability-for-dyslexic-users-with-skip-ink-underlines-bf52a2f3426b On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:15 PM, OwN-3m-All <own3mall@gmail.com> wrote: > > It *is* progress. > > In your opinion. I don't agree. > > > Apple totally did it right; it’s the others who have been doing it wrong. > > Again, opinion. It's not a matter of fact. The underline change is > opinion based. > > The new way is inconsistent and looks bad to my eyes. > > You really prefer the way Chrome renders this text as oppose to Firefox? > > https://s17.postimg.org/qqhjdkyfx/chrome_underline_ugly.jpg > > I don't. > >
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:30:47 UTC