- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:49:06 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 2/21/2018 12:34 PM, OwN-3m-All wrote: >> This is a progression, and improves typography on the Web. > Sorry, but that's not progression. You're plain wrong. Apple should > not be able to dictate what is progress and what isn't. Such a > garbage argument. Please keep your arguments on a technical level, with courtesy to other participants. https://www.w3.org/Consortium/pwe/ Your point appears to be either a) that underlines which cut through descenders are preferable. If so, please cite some legibility or typographic material in support of this assertion. or b) that underlines which cut through descenders are both commonplace and desirable, depended upon, and should not change. In that case, please provide some evidence that this is desirable (as well as just being common). -- Chris Lilley @svgeesus Technical Director @ W3C W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2018 17:49:11 UTC