- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:42:20 +0900
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> On Feb 15, 2018, at 9:30, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: > > Hey all, > > I went to create some new labels, and found that GitHub itself is promoting “Good First Issue” and “Help Wanted”. So that’s what I added to our repo: > > Good First Issue: An uncomplicated change a new person should be able to make. > > Help Wanted: Edits needed for a document without a current editor, pull requests welcome. Hi, These look good to me. However, we also need a bit of (visible) documentation telling people how this works, and in particular how that relates to resolution. Something like this (with a bit of extra context to make sense to newcomers): * If there's been a resolution, the Pull Request needs to be based on what it says. If the spec has an editor, they should follow up and review/merge it. If the spec does not have an editor, then [... insert what we expect people to do ...] * If there hasn't been a resolution, the Pull Request may be merged as is if what it does it trivial and/or the spec is early stage, but quite possibly it will need to be discussed by the WG before being approved. Using the Agenda+ label is a good way to bringing a proposed changed to the attention of the WG. —Florian
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2018 07:43:02 UTC