- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:22:39 -0800
- To: Philip Taylor <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2018 21:23:07 UTC
On Tuesday 2018-12-11 17:35 +0000, Philip Taylor wrote: > Browser support for "width: fit-content" is good but not universal (albeit requiring vendor prefixes in some cases) and for those cases where support is completely lacking one can fall back to "display: table". However, I do not wish to abuse the "display" property in this way if it is unnecessary so to do. Is there any standards-compliant way of falling back on "display: table" IFF "width: <possible vendor prefix>fit-content" is unsupported (as in the case of, e.g., Internet Explorer) ? Yes. See https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional/#at-supports and https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@supports . -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2018 21:23:07 UTC