W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2017

Re: [css-backgrounds] Please remove the "unless there is a border image" wording

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:47:09 -0400
To: www-style@w3.org, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <3b66826d-44ac-9822-781f-3647e6f6d671@inkedblade.net>
Resending 'cuz I forgot to CC.

On 09/21/2017 12:25 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
 > On 9/21/17 12:09 AM, fantasai wrote:
 >> Updated the spec to say
 >>
 >>    # These properties set the style in which a box’s borders are drawn
 >>    # (unless there is a <a href="#border-images">border image</a> drawn in their place).
 >>
 >> Let me know if this seems acceptable.
 >
 > I don't know that this solves the problem of it then sounding like "none" doesn't apply if there is a border-image.
 >
 > The fact is that "none" doesn't set the style.  It controls whether there is a border at all.  So the right non-normative 
summary is:
 >
 >    These properties control whether a border appears, and if it does
 >    what style it's drawn in.  A border-image will override the style,
 >    but not whether a border appears in the first place.

That's much better! I've written it in as

   These properties control whether a border appears,
   and if it does what style it's drawn in
   (if it is not overridden by a <a href="#border-images">border image</a>).

 > At least I assume this text is meant to be non-normative.  It's not actually marked that way, but if it's meant to be 
normative I'm not sure what it's supposed to really be saying in a normative sense.

It's meant to provide an overview of what the property does.
It is normative, but more fully described in the prose below.

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2017 05:47:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:08 UTC