W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2017

Re: [csswg] overflow-3 and overflow-4 and unleveled URLs

From: Peter Linss <peter@linss.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 19:31:35 -0700
Message-Id: <9DF2BA9B-6AC5-4ACA-82B1-2D7F205734B9@linss.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Peter Linss <w3c@linss.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>

> On Oct 9, 2017, at 6:01 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:
> On 10/6/17, 12:49 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>    On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:
>>> On October 5, 2017 9:47:55 AM GMT+09:00, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> So we should be doing:
>>> C. Rename `overflow` to `overflow-4`, then denote in Shepherd that
>>> level 3 is the current version.
>> This seems best, and will also make git archeology easier, when you what to go further back that the last directory rename.
>    Precisely; the switcheroo we do right now seems calculated to make git
>    archeology as hard as possible for as little benefit as possible. This
>    one switch will be annoying for a bunch of specs, but it'll fix things
>    going forward.
>    I'm happy to do the change if the WG is cool with it.
> This sounds good to me, and Peter was OK with the change when I asked on IRC. He did want to check the draft server to make sure there weren’t any assumptions about unleveled directories. Peter – have you had a chance to look at this?

Yep, the server is fine with it.

Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2017 02:32:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:08 UTC