Re: [css-fonts] font-min-size initial

Is there a reason to prefer one or the other?

—Myles

> On Mar 15, 2017, at 10:01 AM, Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 15/03/2017 16:08, Myles C. Maxfield wrote:
>> Don't <<length>>s need units?
> 
> "for zero lengths the unit identifier is optional"
> 
> https://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/#lengths
> 
> JK
> 
>> 
>> –Myles
>> 
>>> On Mar 13, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Jens Oliver Meiert <jens@meiert.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Why does font-min-size [1] have a unit in their initial value, when
>>> that value is 0? I assume this has a reason that I overlooked but want
>>> to rule out that it is a bug :)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#font-min-max-size-prop
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Jens Oliver Meiert
>>> https://meiert.com/en/
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2017 22:01:56 UTC