- From: Dael Jackson <daelcss@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:54:46 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
========================================= These are the official CSSWG minutes. Unless you're correcting the minutes, Please respond by starting a new thread with an appropriate subject line. ========================================= Japan Dev Meetup ---------------- - The suggested date for the meetup is either 18 or 19 April (the evening before the first meeting or the evening of the first meeting). Multicol -------- - Most of the issues will continue on github- the group only discussed the issue titled "How do elements between column-span and its multicol ancestor appear around the span" (https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1072) - There was some interest in simplifying to make column-span apply only to direct children of the multicol element however there was also concern about headings nested in sections and similar use cases. - There was a desire to find out what browsers do to see if there's already compatibility which would also lead to adding some test cases to the test suite. Clarify Segment Break Transformation Rules when multiple segment breaks involve ---------------------------------------------------------------- - The group was in favor of the fix: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/82deba78668e732ad15c084391ffe1910ff3e3d0 It is unclear when offsetX/Y are calculated ------------------------------------------- - Conversation will continue on github. What are "form controls"? ------------------------- - The actual definition of "form control" will defer to the HTML group's open issue. Variation Selection of Colorful (Emoji) or Monochrome Glyphs ------------------------------------------------------------ - RESOLVED: Add font-presentation to the spec and have it effect font fallback. ===== FULL MINUTES BELOW ====== Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0035.html Present: Rachel Andrew Rossen Atanassov David Baron Bogdan Brinza Tantek Çelik Alex Critchfield Benjamin De Cock Elika Etemad Daniel Glazman Tony Graham Dael Jackson Brad Kemper Vladamir Levantovsky Myles Maxfield Thierry Michel Anton Prowse Jen Simmons Alan Stearns Greg Whitworth Regrets: Tab Atkins Bert Bos Dave Cramer Peter Linss Michael Miller Florian Rivoal Geoffrey Sneddon Steve Zilles Scribe: dael Rossen: Let's get going. Rossen: Hello, everyone! Rossen: As usual, a quick call to see if there are any additional agenda items. Japan Dev Meetup ================ Rossen: There was a suggestion for a meet up before or around the F2F in April. Rossen: I forgot who offered to host, but someone graciously offered. <astearns> Oli Studholme Rossen: It's a great opportunity. I wanted to put it to the WG and see interest level and what day to shoot for. Keep in mind we have the publishing meeting on, I believe, Thursday. Rossen: Thoughts? Suggestions? Feedback? dbaron: I think we need to think about language issues in advance if we have the meetup. Rossen: That's right. I believe that shouldn't be different than the industry meetup arrangement. If we have a dev meetup that's mostly presentation-style that might be difficult on the translators. Maybe we have 1 or 2 presentations where we can give them to the translators in advance or have those that can speak the language be the speakers. Rossen: It's a valid point. It's a prerequisite. Rossen: Any other feedback? Rossen: I'll take the silence as no feedback. Rossen: Can we try and schedule for the first day of CSS meetings? 17th I think. Rossen: Any different or better suggestions? Rossen: Second day is the industry meetup. Other option is do it the evening before the first F2F meeting. Rossen: I'm not seeing much engagement. We'll say tentatively proceeding day or first day of F2F meeting. Rossen: We'll go from there. Clarify Segment Break Transformation Rules when multiple segment breaks involve ---------------------------------------------------------------- Rossen: Do we need fantasai? Multicol ======== Specification should define interaction between 'column-span' and 'column-fill' ------------------------------------------------------------------ Rossen: Who wants this? dbaron: I filed it, though I didn't do the agenda+. dbaron: I think...the more interesting is #4 <jensimmons> btw there’s a very annoying bug in multicolumn that I was running into again yesterday. Here’s a demo. http://codepen.io/jensimmons/pen/QpdyMr The list styling is missing from any column but the first one in Safari and Chrome. Likely an old webkit bug (from before the fork). It would be good to fix this. How do elements between column-span and its multicol ancestor appear around the span -------------------------------------------------------------------- <astearns> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1072 dbaron: A little bit of background. When Gecko looked at unprefixing we got feedback that we shouldn't unprefix without support for column-span. dbaron: That's why we're not unprefixed. So we had an engineer look at impl it and the spec didn't answer basic questions about impl which is surprising to me as the spec is impl in 3 other engines. dbaron: Issue 1072 is about what happens with a column spanning element that's not a child of the multicol. dbaron: The spec doesn't say what happens to all the CSS properties spec on those things when the column-span: all splits them. It feels like a new version of block and inline splitting, but more complicated since it's doing both. dbaron: I'm curious what people thought was supposed to happen. florian made a comment, but I hadn't looked into what the other implementations do. Rossen: Our logic is what you just explained. We take into account only first level children of the multicol for the purpose of spanning. dbaron: mmkay. dbaron: I think that's more reasonable though some people say headings are a few levels down. Rossen: Right. I'm just describing our path. dbaron: Yeah Rossen: All the layout interactions for multicol happen on the level of the multicol. Nothing propagates inside. We didn't want another weird ancestor dependency. dbaron: That makes a lot of sense to me. * iank checks what happens in blink.... Rossen: So if the spec is unclear, I would be in favor of clearing that part up so far as there's consensus around the WG. iank: I have to check with Morton at Opera, but pending his feedback I'm fine with simplifying it to direct decedents. Rossen: Okay. Rossen: Any other feedback? Rossen: Should we record a resolution pending Morton's feedback, waiting until next week to call it final? <fantasai> needs a minute or two <fantasai> I'm concerned about checking in on use cases <fantasai> Do we really want to prevent e.g. 2nd level heading from spanning if the author is using nested <section> markup. Rossen: The only thing before we can resolve, I see fantasai is trying to get connected and she has something to bring up Rossen: [reads] Rossen: To restate her model: what we do for position elements and propagate into their containing block for layouts. This is another model we can adopt. As an implementor I wouldn't be terribly excited about it. It's another indirect layout dependency. Rossen: It adds a large bit of complexity for a narrow use case. <fantasai> If we were to define that case to work, would trigger fragmentation rules <fantasai> Spanning element would be effectively outside of its container <fantasai> But otherwise doesn't seem to crazy to make that work within the same block formatting context Rossen: To end quoting fantasai [reads] [fantasai's audio connects] fantasai: I would say the model would only work if you're in the same BFC. If you just outside we don't span. I think there are...it makes sense you might want to do that within some descendants because they want to do section level markup. fantasai: In terms of how to impl I think when you encounter spanning element you trigger a page break and layout as a child of the multicol and then continue after. fantasai: So everything would break and the spanning element would not be inside. dbaron: I think that produces unacceptable results where backgrounds aren't behind descendants and confuses the a11y rules. fantasai: I can't say you'd get a reasonable result if you do anything other than that. You have a blue section with yellow text and your element spans outside there's no way to wrap the blue dbaron: You can say all the elements it breaks have blocks like the block and inline splitting. astearns: And that's what Morton's comment refers to. I read his comment that he does allow it in blink. dbaron: I agree it does. But I think he said he doesn't put the background behind which I think is the wrong way to do it if we allow. It's maybe simpler to impl. <fantasai> dbaron, I think you *want* not having the background behind the spanning element fantasai: Another thing is one major use case for spanning is images that are likely to be embedded in a section. jensimmons: I can see wanting to see images or figures to span. There could be complexity. fantasai: Anything inside the spanning could be okay. The case is using section elements. It's elements between you and the element establishing multicol. Anything in that section could not break out and span. Rossen: How many impl are unprefixed? We are. Rossen: Who else? <iank> we are Rossen: Webkit and Blink? iank: Blink is. Rossen: Webkit? myles: I have to look. Rossen: I'm curious to see if we have interop and if we do I'd like to know what the compat breakage would look like. Column-span is a fairly common behavior for multicol. I don't want to start breaking a REC spec. <fantasai> It's a CR, not a REC Rossen: We could continue discussion on github. I don't feel we're ready to resolve. To summarize: there was some impl that were leaning toward the behavior Edge has, to only consider first level children. fantasai brought up some additional points. I think we need to discuss more once iank and Blink can catch up with Morton. Rossen: Or dbaron did you want a resolution? dbaron: Github is fine. myles: Our CSS is unprefixed. Rossen: Do you consider anything other than first level children? myles: No idea. Rossen: Let's take discussion to github. We'll need to figure out behavior and go from there. dbaron: We could get some test written to cover these. <iank> example: <iank> https://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?%3C!DOCTYPE%20html%3E%0A%3Cstyle%3E%0A%23multi%20%7B%20columns%3A%202%3B%20%20width%3A%20300px%3B%20%7D%0A%23spanner%20%7B%20column-span%3A%20all%3B%20height%3A%2020px%3B%20background%3A%20green%3B%20%7D%0A%3C%2Fstyle%3E%0A%3Cdiv%20id%3Dmulti%3E%0A%20%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%0A%20%20%3Cdiv%3E%3Cdiv%20id%3Dspanner%3E%3C%2Fdiv%3E%3C%2Fdiv%3E%0A%20%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%20text%0A%3C%2Fdiv%3E <iank> https://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?saved=4924 astearns: By my reading of item #3 it's basically the same issue as #4. dbaron: It's a bit different, but I think we should defer all of multicol. astearns: All or just column span? dbaron: All 4 are column span. Clarify Segment Break Transformation Rules when multiple segment breaks involve ================================================================= <astearns> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/836 fantasai: xidorn pointed out we don't merge segment breaks. We should be removing segment breaks together so when they transform they do so as a unit. fantasai: I checked in a fix to do that, I wanted to check if anyone wanted to look more closely. astearns: Any concerns about this fix? <astearns> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/82deba78668e732ad15c084391ffe1910ff3e3d0 astearns: The actual change is ^ astearns: This is a heads up to look and if you have issues please re-open the issue. Otherwise we'll assume it's good. It is unclear when offsetX/Y are calculated =========================================== <astearns> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1070 astearns: fantasai you did the agenda+ but there's been discussion afterwards. fantasai: Question in my mind is...there was discussion as to what's easier to impl or makes sense we should get a resolution, but it's fine to defer if it needs more discussion. astearns: Looks like discussion is going well on github. So let's keep going on there until it comes toward a conclusion. Unless anyone on the call has an opinion? What are "form controls"? ========================= <astearns> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024 astearns: I think this is a "do we still need to do anything" Do we still need to define form controls after the other resolutions or do we have something workable to use? fantasai: I think we decided we're making all form controls behave as display:none. We need a definition, but I think we can point at HTML and ask them to define it or put some hand wavy discussion in the spec, <astearns> html issue: https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2359 astearns: Here's the HTML issue. There's discussion. I don't see they have anything we can refer to yet. astearns: But I'm happy to close our issue in favor of that one. Variation Selection of Colorful (Emoji) or Monochrome Glyphs ============================================================ <myles> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/352 <astearns> specific proposal in this comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/352#issuecomment-284923814 myles: To give background: Emoji have 2 ways to draw them conceptually. From any emoji you can draw in emoji style ( colorful) or text. myles: The way this is impl inside fonts there is a unicode code point you can put after the emoji. This one attaches to the previous emoji and now you have the information you need to draw. myles: This is impl on some platforms that the addition of this causes you to perform font fallback differently. myles: If you have the one to say draw in emoji it will cause us to fallback to a font that can handle color. myles: Being able to control emoji or text style is something we've had requests for. Currently a web author would have to add variations at every code point. myles: This issue proposes a new property which is font-presentation: auto|text|emoji myles: This property could affect font fallback. So if you set it on elements the font fallback for come character in the element you might select a color font. myles: I was hoping to know if people had thoughts. fantasai: Do normal variation selections on ideographic character affect font fallback? myles: They don't. There's many variation selectors...There's 2 that are special, emoji and text. Those two require modifications to font fallback. All the others should not. They're used for things like CJK where you have a variation to a glyph where it's not required. fantasai: Yeah. I was curious. Either way I think we should make a decision if it affects font fallback based on what they want. It makes sense to affect fallback because if you specify this it means you care. fantasai: I think the decision on if it affects fallback in this case is different then the CJK case. I think the proposal makes sense to me overall. fantasai: Are there characters effected that are not emoji? myles: No. The set of characters that allow the variation, there's a list of them in unicode. And every one in that table has both text and emoji. astearns: So if this font-presentation is set to emoji and applies to syntax outside that table it doesn't affect font fallback? myles: Yeah. Vlad: What selectors do we have now that would control between color and monochrome? I could easily see the more universal where if there's monochrome or color you would want that control. Would this allow control to switch between monochrome and color render for non-emoji? myles: I thought this would interact with cmap table. Vlad: In the color font you have the cmap table where it resolves character to glyph index. But you also have opportunity to resolve between monochome and color. I don't know if that's possible today. myles: I'm not...I don't have a strong opinion. It sounds reasonable to allow a UA to do that. It shouldn't be forced but it sounds like it should be allowed. Vlad: Do you see this new selector would be generic enough to switch between versions of monochrome and color glyphs? I just don't think it's reasonable to only use it for emoji if you have similar condition for other glyphs. myles: That's true. I'm a little scared because new tables can be added all the time. Trying to overload the meaning of this...I guess I feel this proposal is just for the concept of variation selectors. If we want to extend maybe we can, but I think that's secondary. Vlad: Okay. I think that may be an additional discussion. Maybe an issue on github where we can discuss the details. astearns: I'd like to resolve this for this purpose and have a new issue on if it can be extended. Vlad: Even for this purpose...you can have one font with both monochrome and color and a different font with only monochrome. One case you'd want to switch between variations and the other you'd want font fallback. myles: In order for what's proposed it must select font fallback. Your argument is that this should not be used for the use case. fantasai: I think the proposal is good. I think we should add it to the spec, have myles sketch the details, and then file issues. Overall I think it's a good plan. Vlad: Okay. I don't mind looking at the specifics. astearns: proposal: add font-presentation to the spec and have it affect font fallback. Obj? * fantasai thinks the name could probably use some improvement, but is in favor of adding to the spec and working that out later :) <myles> fantasai: yeah, feel free to help me come up with a better one. i just chose presentation cause that's what Unicode calls it <myles> but i'm happy to change it to something better <fantasai> myles, don't have a better suggestion atm. Mark an issue into the spec, link it to a GitHub issue, and let's see if we can get any brainstorming :) <myles> fantasai: 👍 RESOLVED: add font-presentation to the spec and have it affect font fallback. astearns: That's the end of the agenda. Anything extra? Housekeeping Reminders ====================== astearns: Housekeeping reminder: we have Tokyo F2F coming up. Plan your trips and add yourself to the wiki. Houdini is the day before. dbaron: Another housekeeping reminder: summertime in the US starts this weekend. Our telecon is pinned to the US. So everyone not in the US the call will be one hour EARLIER next week. This is the dangerous one where if you make a mistake you miss the telecon. <glazou> +1 to what dbaron just said astearns: This is next week and the week after? dbaron: For Europeans it's for 2 weeks. For people that don't observe summer time it's until November. astearns: So be aware that meeting times will be odd for the next two weeks+. astearns: I think we're done. Thanks everybody!
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2017 00:55:51 UTC