- From: Ian Yang <ian.html@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 19:05:59 +0800
- To: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org>
- Cc: CSS public list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 15 January 2017 11:06:31 UTC
2017-01-15 18:59 GMT+08:00 Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org>: > The CSS Working Group just had a face to face meeting and so are > probably not looking at this list right now. > > There's a scope question sometimes - e.g. what should differentiate > browsers - and also a context question - sometimes people need one > behaviour and sometimes the other, which is why e.g. word processors > often have a "paste with formating" or "paste without formatting" > option. > > If you're pasting a numbered list into a word processor and the numbers > are copied, you can end up with two sets of numbers, because the > numbered-list-ness gets pasted too. So I thnk there isn't a single > right answer, but I'll let others comment who've thought more deeply > about it. Thank you. At least we had confirmed that ::before and ::after are part of the document (in an informal sense) just as images are. Ian Yang
Received on Sunday, 15 January 2017 11:06:31 UTC