Le 2017-08-20 08:49, Rachel Andrew a écrit : [snipped] > *STATE OF THE TEST SUITE* > > Repeatedly through the years is mention of the state of the test > suite, the fact that tests were submitted and not reviewed etc. I > think my next move involves having a look at where that all is. Again, > I don’t have historical context. I have reviewed at least 107 tests of the Multi column test suite: http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/search/testcase/spec/css-multicol-1/reviewer/gtalbot/load/t107/#t16 Each reviewed test by me has a <link rel="reviewer" title="Gérard Talbot" href="http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/" /> <!-- YYYY-MM-DD --> with the exact, real date. The reviews were done between june 29th 2013 and october 2013: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2013Jul/ http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2013Aug/ http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2013Sep/ About 99% of all of my work is still available here: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3Multi-Columns/ http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3Multi-Columns/Opera/ http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3Multi-Columns/Opera/NewTests/ http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3Multi-Columns/howcome/ > Were all the tests that ended up on WPT reviewed by anything other > than the original submitter? By definition, a test can not be reviewed by its author. GérardReceived on Sunday, 20 August 2017 19:53:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:15:04 UTC