W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2016

Re: [css3-selectors]: Proposal: Adop the ::wrap pseudo element

From: Ian Yang <ian.html@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:28:22 +0800
Message-ID: <CAFhBhuO7CyG9ew-OeKmKLwWpTQB8v1+0HaUZobAaGpedxihQSA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Cc: CSS public list <www-style@w3.org>
Thanks Florian Rivoal. Could you please let us know of which browser you
are currently an implementor, and the technical reason that you regard
::wrap as hard to implement?

2016-10-19 10:20 GMT+08:00 Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>:

>
> On Oct 19, 2016, at 10:25, Ian Yang <ian.html@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2016-10-18 20:17 GMT+08:00 Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>:
>
>> On 18 October 2016 at 09:42, Ian Yang <ian.html@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > 2016-10-11 11:37 GMT+08:00 Ian Yang <ian.html@gmail.com>:
>> >>
>> >> For your information, an issue had just been opened in W3C's CSSWG
>> repository for editor's drafts on GitHub. The url is
>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/588
>> >>
>> >> Your participation is welcomed.
>> >
>> >
>> > Maybe I wasn't made it clear that the purpose of the thread is to get
>> more people involved when I was creating the thread on GitHub. Therefore
>> there had been no one replied after a week. And after I post a reply an
>> hour ago to encourage people to participate, soon there was someone replied.
>> >
>> > So if you are willing to see this pseudo element being added and CSS
>> become more superior, please kindly participate. Thank you very much.
>>
>> I've added some more comments on the GitHub issue. I suggest to
>> continue the discussion there.
>>
>> Sebastian
>>
>
> It looks like that the thread on GitHub has been closed by Mr. Tab Atkins
> Jr., and the reason is that implementors have historically been strongly
> against this sort of functionality.
>
> However, ever since the the topics were created at here and on GitHub, we
> haven't seen a single implementor say this feature is very hard to
> implement. I hope Tab Atkins can provide us with some references or evidences
> that prove implementors' anti-interest.
>
>
> Tab does represent Google, so I would count his voice has one implementor.
>
>  - Florian
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2016 02:28:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:15:01 UTC