W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2016

[csswg] Agenda conf call 12-Oct-2016

From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:34:25 +0000
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BC2D1274-C9E0-42DA-90B2-4E1D5F55C0B1@adobe.com>
Time/Phone/WebEx details available to WG Members in w3c-css-wg.
See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2015AprJun/0206.html


US Toll Number: +1-617-324-0000

For local times, see:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20161012T16


0. Extra agenda items and other digressions




1. Upcoming 2017 meetings

2. Merge csswg-test into web-platform-tests
   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Oct/0088.html


3. [css-syntax] [css21] url parsing contradiction between 2.1 and Syntax
   https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/412


4. [css2][css-inline] Definition of line-height calculations contradicts itself
   https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/391


5. [css-multicol] the minimum and preferred width of a multicol is not defined anywhere
   https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/420


6. [css-box-3][css-21] Positioning boxes with { float:left; width:0px; }
   https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/576


Then TPAC agenda overflow items, as time allows:


CSS Pseudo Elements 
    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Acss-pseudo-4


CSS Containment Terminology question

@apply: Thinking we should put on back burner, as variables + ::part seems like sufficient feature set for v1 of custom elements. Agree?

Baseline alignment issues
    first/last syntax

Hoisting things to table wrappers
    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/324#issuecomment-235652352


clip-path excluding fixed-position descendants


Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2016 00:34:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:15:01 UTC