Re: PROPOSED RESOLUTION: merge csswg-test into web-platform-tests

Superb, thank you for the clarification!

/koji

2016-10-06 0:06 GMT+09:00 Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com>:

> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I agree with you in general, but as we try to move Writing Modes to
> PR/REC,
> > Gecko and Blink have 100% test coverages for this test suite, we keep
> them
> > up-to-date whenever tests were added/updated, and I need this view[1] to
> > track our progress and status. Flexbox[2] has quite good test coverage
> too.
> >
> > What is rough time frame in your mind to make csswg-test read-only, and
> to
> > have the better replacement for the test results? If the replacement of
> the
> > results view comes earlier than read-only, or if the read-only is after
> > Writing Modes REC, I'm fine.
> >
> > [1]
> > http://test.csswg.org/harness/results/css-writing-modes-3_
> dev/grouped/filter/17/
> > [2] http://test.csswg.org/harness/results/css-flexbox-1_dev/grouped/
>
> Oh, maybe I should be clearer: the test harness will not stop working
> because of making csswg-test read-only. It'll stop working when we
> drop the build step, which will remain working within the css
> subdirectory of web-platform-tests, and that'll happen once we have a
> replacement.
>
> /gsnedders
>