- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 16:25:10 -0400
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, Peter Krautzberger <peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org>
On 04/10/2016 10:33 , Florian Rivoal wrote: >> If I had a wish my preferred option would be to have the ability to mark >> > up alternatives in HTML, a bit like <switch> but *without* the built-in >> > behaviour: >> > >> > <alternative> >> > <variant><math>...</math></variant> >> > <variant><svg>...</svg></variant> >> > <variant><img></variant> >> > <variant>some long textual description</variant> >> > </alternative> >> > >> > As an author I could specify my preferred option (perhaps just through >> > order) but the browser could override me ("nope I don't understand that >> > well enough", "my user actually prefers that one") and could afford >> > users the option of switching between representations. >> > >> > That would match my publishing needs far better (and as a user I would >> > also love the option to switch to text in many cases). I do however >> > realise that this is a much more involved change. > > Interesting (and completely out of scope for the CSSWG:). How would you > deal with not showing all alternatives in UAs that are not aware of this new element, > without asking the author to hard-code in their stylesheet or markup which variant > should be display:none? This is completely out of scope but if I had to actually design this instead of wave my hands I would do so using the <template> element. -- • Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon • http://science.ai/ — intelligent science publishing •
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2016 20:25:35 UTC