Re: Unicode request for CSS property to control emoji style [I18N-ACTION-500] from Phillips, Addison on 2016-03-25 (www-style@w3.org from March 2016)

From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:19:10 +0000
To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, intlcore <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, Mark Davis ☕️ <mark@macchiato.com>
Message-ID: <qttg063p1lb8a0w7p1d9gvm0.1458915530311@email.android.com>

On March 24, 2016, at 11:34 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>It reveals another question, what should we do if the text have already explicitly included the variation selector? Should we always override it or only do so for characters without the selector?
>

The proposed Unicode TR51 update covers that case: the variation selector overrides styling.

Addison

Received on Friday, 25 March 2016 14:20:03 UTC