- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:54:32 +0000
- To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>, Peter Moulder <pjrm@mail.internode.on.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 3/20/16, 9:39 AM, "a.fedoniouk@gmail.com on behalf of Andrew Fedoniouk" <a.fedoniouk@gmail.com on behalf of news@terrainformatica.com> wrote: > > >Other than just drawing paths CSS has a need to define paths in other places. >For example here: >https://www.w3.org/TR/css-shapes-1/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/css-shapes-1/> > >To have unified path notation would be beneficial I think. I agree. There’s a sketch of how to add path() to the set of CSS Shapes in level 2 [1]. I’ve been meaning to add path() to level 1, as there appears to be more implementer interest than I expected. Thanks, Alan [1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-shapes-2/#supported-basic-shapes
Received on Sunday, 20 March 2016 19:55:04 UTC