- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 19:37:31 -0800
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:38:01 UTC
If will have such functions then following scenarios will become feasible:
To define aspect ratio:
div { width: 100%;
height: width(50%); /* 2:1 aspect ratio */ }
To define line-height always match defined height:
input {
width: auto;
height: 1.4em;
line-height: height(100%);
}
width(<percent>) and height(<percent>) are non symmetrical in the sense
that:
width(<percent>), when used in height related properties ( e.g. height,
line-height ), uses computed width of the element. Otherwise it gets
calculated against defined width if it is defined in <length> or evaluated
to 'auto'.
and height(<percent>), if used not in height property, always calculated
against declared height if it is given in <length> units. In all other
cases it gets used as 'auto'.
This will help to solve ugly "solutions" like this one for example:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1495407/maintain-the-aspect-ratio-of-a-div-with-css
--
Andrew Fedoniouk.
http://sciter.com
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:38:01 UTC