On 03/04/2016 02:24 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Sergio Villar Senin <svillar@igalia.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> the grid item placement algorithm has been recently changed so that it >> considers that a grid cell belonging to a named grid area is an occupied >> cell. This means that auto-placed items won't occupy those cells covered >> by a named grid area. > > That's actually from Sep 2014 ^_^ > <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/dc00d0899df224495ee1795f3d54ea0c2a0ce3c4> Actually, it's from https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/33f3401c55cd https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/33f3401c55cd/css-grid/Overview.src.html I don't recall discussing the change. > Good questions. I've pinged fantasai for her opinions, but as I see > it, we have three reasonable options: > tho.) > > 3. Drop this line, so only explicitly placed things matter. Unless there's a good reason not to, we should revert back to the Microsoft-specified behavior, that is, choose #3. Also, let's not mix up substantive changes and editorial rewrites next time? :) :) ~fantasaiReceived on Friday, 4 March 2016 20:55:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:57 UTC