W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2016

Re: [css-transforms] Individual transform properties, stacking contexts, containing blocks

From: Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:22:12 +0000
Message-ID: <CAGTfzwSsT4CTuHC+rOnUPS=q-XnEgsbwO4HDZFOR3rMD8fNAew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matt Rakow <marakow@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Having a default 'none' (and every other value establishing a stacking
context) is probably best so that animations that sweep through the zeroes
(translate: 0px, rotate: 0deg, and scale: 1) don't pop in and out of
stacking context/containing block.

Tracked here: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/244

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:32 AM Matt Rakow <marakow@microsoft.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> Any non-"none" value for the transform property causes the element to
> establish a stacking context and containing block.  The individual
> transform properties are not currently specified as establishing either of
> these; should they (I think yes)?
> If yes, when?  Do these properties also need a "none" value as the default?
> Thanks,
> -Matt
Received on Sunday, 26 June 2016 11:22:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:03 UTC