W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2016

Re: [csswg] Agenda conf call 15-June-2016

From: Lea Verou <lea@verou.me>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:50:51 +0200
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D6A6B522-B21B-43E8-814F-C60F4A53477C@verou.me>
To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Regrets, travelling.

Lea Verou ✿ http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou







> On 15Jun, 2016, at 03:00, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> Time/Phone/WebEx details available to WG Members in w3c-css-wg.
> See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2015AprJun/0206.html
> US Toll Number: +1-617-324-0000
> 
> For local times, see:
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20160615T16
> 
> 0. Extra agenda items and other digressions
> 
> 
> 1. CSSWG Charter
>   Finalizing the non-deliverable sections
>   Date wrangling for all our deliverables!
> 
> 2. Fragment URL handling
>    In order to handle the resolution in SF:
>      https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0209.html
>    We added a new section for special fragment URL handling,
>      https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#local-urls
>    which needs review. See also question at
>      https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0029.html
> 
> 3. calc() serialization
>    We resolved on what the spec should say
>    but probably someone other than me and Tab should have a look
>    to make sure the spec actually says what it should say. :)
>      https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#calc-serialize
>    Section needs review! Please take a look and comment. "This looks
>    good to me" is also a helpful comment.
> 
> 4. Canonical values for serialization
>    In order to define calc() serialization, we had to add a new section:
>      https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#compat
>    and define the canonical unit of each type. We'd like the WG to
>    approve adding this concept. Review of whether concept is correctly
>    added is also good.
> 
>    Relatedly, we also need to choose a canonical unit of <resolution>,
>    as it's not obvious which one to choose given the suggestion in
>    CSSOM (dpcm) seemed incorrect.
>      https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/178
> 
> 5. [css-values][cssom] Which unit to serialize <resolution> with?
>   https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/178
> 
> 6. Follow up on logical keywords for floats: start/end vs inline-start/inline-end
> 
> 
> 
>   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0010.html
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alan
Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2016 15:51:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:47 UTC