W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2016

Re: [css-sizing] min-content for replaced elements with an aspect ratio

From: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:51:40 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPTJ0XHworRDDgXmJogmkh3fibWPwayhd1FN63bb2KfVFD-n-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com>
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 01/27/2016 09:48 AM, Christian Biesinger wrote:
>> Looking at Flexbox testcases I was wondering what the min-content size
>> should be for a case like:
>> <img style="width: min-content; height: 100px;" size="image-60x60.gif">
> [...]
>> So that points to the width in the example being 60px, but that does
>> not seem to be the understanding of Gecko
> Are you sure about Gecko? For me, Gecko seems to resolve the min-content
> width to 60px in your example.
> Data URI:
> data:text/html,<img style="width: -moz-min-content; height: 100px;"
> src="http://placehold.it/60x60">
> JSFiddle version (with -webkit prefix added & no-prefix version as well):
>  https://jsfiddle.net/t9Laskra/

Oh. I hadn't actually tested it, this was based on an email
conversation I had with Rego... I assume Gecko would also resolve it
to 60px for a flexbox min-width: auto?

Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2016 19:52:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:00 UTC