Re: [css-grid] Subgrids considered essential

Can you explain why 'display:contents' is not a good solution to the
problem you describe?

It seems much simpler than subgrids to me. On your blog you described it as
"a hack", but I don't see it that way. Normally in CSS an element lays out
its children but not (directly) their descendants; display:contents is a
generic way to lift an element's children to be laid out by its parent.
This is exactly what we need here. It makes more sense to me to have
display:contents than separate specs for subgrids, subblocks, subflexboxes,
subtablerows, etc.

Rob
-- 
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr  rdn rdsme,anea lurpr  edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
toD
selthor  stor  edna  siewaoeodm  or v sstvr  esBa  kbvted,t
rdsme,aoreseoouoto
o l euetiuruewFa  kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr  rdm  or rnea
lurpr
.a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t  nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr
esn