- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:59:55 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Johannes Wilm <johanneswilm@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Brad Kemper On Jan 25, 2016, at 3:05 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yeah well, current floats cannot move things to new pages. So the page float >> spec will have to try to reinterpret what "clearing" means in the context of >> page floats, at least to some extend, and I'm trying to figure out how you >> guys would think is the most natural way of transferring what clear does >> today in a context of page floats. > > We don't have to, and shouldn't, reinterpret anything. ^_^ Just > translate the concepts over directly, and then add new functionality > as required. Except these things are more like stackable exclusions, and not that much like existing floats. If the property was renamed 'wrap-stack' (since exclusion props all start with 'wrap-', and this new spec is about how to stack them in x and y directions), then the "clearing" property could be called whatever we want. If it is similar enough to 'clear', then we could call it 'wrap-stack-clear' and try to translate the concepts from 'clear', but we shouldn't be too slavish about it if the concept of what we need isn't really a good fit with the concept of clearing.
Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2016 16:00:38 UTC