W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2016

Re: [css-round-display] Summary of a discussion about polar positioning in every positioning schemes

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:34:44 -0800
Cc: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <AB4F4284-D645-49AA-97E0-CA82C9F81D1E@gmail.com>
To: Jihye Hong <jh.hong@lge.com>

> On Jan 19, 2016, at 11:39 PM, Jihye Hong <jh.hong@lge.com> wrote:
> * polar-origin and polar-anchor can be used independently from the polar
> positioning.
> * polar-origin and polar-anchor need to get rid of a prefix, 'polar-'
> * auto values for polar-origin and polar-anchor to resolve differently when
> polar-distance is auto or non-auto
>    - when polar-distance is auto, 
>      - polar-origin: auto becomes polar-anchor: 0 0
>      - polar-anchor: auto becomes polar-anchor: 0 0
>    - when polar-distance is non auto, 
>      - polar-origin: auto becomes polar-anchor: center center
>      - polar-anchor: auto becomes polar-anchor: 0 0

We need to rethink some of these if fantasai's alignment properties fit our needs. I'm a little short on time right now for a full reply, but IF they do, then polar-origin is no longer necessary. It also would mean that top, right, bottom, and left would apply. I've been trying to get a fuller understanding of that spec, I hope you will also try to dig into it too. 

I don't think I agree with what you are saying about polar-anchor, above. polar-anchor: 0 0 should just mean that you are not shifting it from where it is after positioning and figuring margins. polar-anchor: -25% 0 should mean move it one fourth of its width to the left. This should be regardless of other polar-* properties. 
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2016 22:35:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:33 UTC