- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:24:50 +0330
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 03/24/2013 12:10 AM, Simon Sapin wrote: > Hi, > > It’s been discussed on this list a few times here but I don’t remember if there was a conclusion. More importantly, I can’t > find a definitive answer in the ED. > > What should an UA do if it only wants to support or can only support 2D transforms? > > The "Partial implementations" section seems to indicate that any 'transform' property declaration or attribute value should be > considered invalid if it contains a 3D functions. (2D and 3D functions already are in different spec section, so that’s good.) > > Similarly, I suppose that the 'transform-style', 'perspective', 'perspective-origin' and 'backface-visibility' are ignored. Or > should the values that establish a stacking context still do that? > > The more tricky part is transform-origin with three values. Should a 3-value declaration be invalid? Or should the third just > be ignored? It's a bit late, but the WG is in the process of addressing this comment by re-splitting Transforms into 2D and 3D. :p ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 31 December 2016 12:00:09 UTC