W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2016

Re: [css-text-decor] Emphasis marks and font variant

From: Ken Lunde <lunde@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 21:36:27 +0000
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
CC: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, John Daggett <jdaggett@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <FA9DC92E-D061-40DA-BF26-AC2D4C71495D@adobe.com>
Looks good.

> On Dec 23, 2016, at 10:04 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> 
> On 12/23/2016 12:57 AM, Ken Lunde wrote:
>> Elika,
>> 
>> Two things should happen when applying the 'ruby' GSUB feature. One is to get the substituted glyphs, which are specifically tuned for ruby use. For some fonts, such as Adobe-Japan1-4 and greater Japanese ones, the 'ruby' GSUB feature will return different glyphs. For other fonts, such as Kenten Generic, it's a no-op because the glyphs are already tuned for ruby use. The other thing that needs to happen is for the client to scale the glyphs, usually to 50%. This is outside the scope of the OpenType 'ruby' GSUB feature.
>> 
>> Anyway, to answer your question, I think that the answer is yes. For some fonts, different glyphs will be returned (Adobe-Japan1-4 and greater), and for other fonts, the feature is not supported, which results in a no-op (Kenten Generic). In both cases, the glyphs, whether substituted or not, need to be scaled.
> 
> Thanks for the info! I've updated to apply 'ruby' as you recommend,
> and will run it by the WG for the next publication. The spec now reads
> 
> # The marks should be drawn using the element’s font settings with
> # the addition of the ruby feature and the size scaled down 50%.
> # However, since not all fonts have all these glyphs, and some fonts
> # use inappropriate sizes for emphasis marks in these code points,
> # the UA may opt to use a font known to be good for emphasis marks,
> # or the marks may instead be synthesized by the UA. Marks must
> # remain upright in vertical typographic modes: like CJK characters,
> # they do not rotate to match the writing mode.
> 
> ~fantasai

Received on Friday, 23 December 2016 21:36:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:05 UTC