- From: Robert Hogan <robhogan@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 09:37:00 +0000
- To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2016 09:37:37 UTC
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 7:25 PM François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote: > That was the intent of the spec, since we have to make the assumption > fragmentainers might not all share the same size. > > > > Trying to define what happens with fragementation without writing down an > algorithm was not easy, so maybe we should actually try to define an > algorithm in the spec. > > > > What do you think of this proposal? > > > I'm reading it to say that as long as repeating the header and footer leaves room for at least part of a tbody row in the fragmentainer then they can both remain. If it doesn't, but dropping the repeated footer allows room for at least part of a tbody row, then drop the repeated footer but keep the repeated header. This means that https://jsbin.com/pozizikopa/quiet would be rendered as https://output.jsbin.com/xelicehibo/quiet for example. I had expected you to say that where a tbody row can't fit in full in a fragmentainer that both header and footer should be dropped from that fragmentainer so I just want to be sure I'm not misreading your proposal! Thanks, Rob
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2016 09:37:37 UTC