- From: Jan Norden <jan.norden@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:27:19 +0100
- To: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Cc: W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+239uGuqVA7Y+Ei5kVjC8nZzMNuHEyKhewg9PW0nurDUsQmAQ@mail.gmail.com>
That is indeed a much better wording, though I think it is more appropriate to add them before https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#dom-window-innerwidth, in anaoigy with https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#dom-window-screen <https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#dom-window-screeny>x and https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#dom-window-outerwidth . Given that, what is the correct way to propose adding window.innerScreenX and window.innerScreenY to the draft standard? And what is the process for getting such a proposal approved/rejected? 2016-12-14 16:09 GMT+01:00 Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>: > Le 2016-12-13 08:46, Jan Norden a écrit : > >> There is currently no good way of translation a position in a browser to a >> position on the screen. >> > > Jan, > > Let me rephrase what I believe you were trying to say here, like this: > there is currently no possible way of getting (retrieving) window's > viewport (or client area) x and y coordinates of a browser in relation to > the (operating system) screen area. > > Our particular need is translating a gaze-position >> (which we have in screen coordinates from our eyetracking hardware). >> >> It is possible in Firefox, using the proprietary >> mozInnerScreenX/mozInnerScreenY, >> but not in general. >> > > window.screenX > https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/API/Window/screenX > > window.mozInnerScreenX > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/mozInnerScreenX > > window.screenY > https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/API/Window/screenY > > window.mozInnerScreenY > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/mozInnerScreenY > > > I added the mozInnerScreenX and mozInnerScreenY properties into an old > webpage > > http://www.gtalbot.org/DHTMLSection/WindowEventsNS6.html > > and, as far as I can see, the mozInnerScreenX and mozInnerScreenY > properties return the equivalent of IE's screenLeft and screenTop. > > " > There is a major incompatibility between MSIE 5+ window.screenTop and NS > 6+ window.screenY. MSIE 5+ calculates the distance from the top of the > content area (client area) to the top side of the screen. NS 6+ calculates > the distance from the top of the browser's window to the top side of the > screen. There seems to be no way to figure out the height of chrome > elements (menu bar, tools bar, address bar, links bar) present in the > browser for MSIE 5+. > " > so, the addition of mozInnerScreenX and mozInnerScreenY properties makes > sense. > > http://www.gtalbot.org/DHTMLSection/ScreenXYComparedScreenLeftTop.html > > IE6, IE7, IE8 supported window.screenLeft and window.screenTop which are, > by definition, the equivalent of mozInnerScreenX and mozInnerScreenY. I > presumed here that window.screenLeft and window.screenTop are still > supported by IE9, IE10, IE11. > > window.screenLeft > "Retrieves the x-coordinate of the upper left-hand corner of the window > frame, relative to the upper left-hand corner of the screen." > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms534389(v=vs.85).aspx > > window.screenTop > "Retrieves the y-coordinate of the upper left-hand corner of the window > frame, relative to the upper left-hand corner of the screen. " > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms534390(v=vs.85).aspx > > Returning now to your initial statement, I believe there is a way of > getting window's viewport (or client area) position of a browser in > relation to the (operating system) screen area in Gecko-based browsers and > in IE browsers. I do not know (I can not verify) if window.screenLeft and > window.screenTop are supported in Edge12+ browsers but typically Microsoft > does not remove proprietary attributes or properties of objects unless > there is already a web standard (and widespread-used) equivalent. So I > would presume that window.screenLeft and window.screenTop are supported in > Edge12+ browsers too. > > From a web standards point of view, best would be to have and to use only > 1 pair of property name (window.innerScreenX and window.innerScreenY, no > moz prefix), to have Microsoft to drop window.screenLeft and > window.screenTop and to include such pair of property names in > CSSOM View Module > https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/ > inside the §4. Extensions to the Window Interface, say, right after, > https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#dom-window-screeny > > Gérard > -- /Jan Norden
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:27:52 UTC