W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2016

Re: [css3-selectors]: Proposal: :in-view() selector for better visibility control

From: Alexander Shpack <shadowkin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 10:11:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CAK4xKXmmspWyh6UTtmQm23G1_cQqf=cD1hofrpq7cA=LDP66TA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <mark@mercurylang.org>
Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
> Even if this concept of frames were to be accepted, you have only
> defined the behaviour of frame N+1 in terms of frame N. The case of
> N=1 is still not well-defined. (What should print media do, for
> example?)
>
>
First frame is fully rendered page. I thought it's obviously.
Good question about print media. Print media has no viewport (or viewport
is equal to all pages and all content), so, this pseudoclass shouldn't be
applied for this media.


>
> Unfortunately, your definition for this selector is still circular.
>
>
Could you explain how it possible?

-- 
s0rr0w
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2016 08:12:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 December 2016 08:12:40 UTC