- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:22:18 -0400
- To: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
On 08/07/2015 05:41 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote: > On 7/8/15 03:46, fantasai wrote: >> On 08/06/2015 05:45 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote: >>> I'm wondering how <iframe>s should be handled when writing-mode is >>> vertical. >>> ... >>> which could easily be read as being applicable to <iframe> content, >>> unless that content explicitly resets writing-mode to its >>> initial value. Clarification? >> >> Yeah, that needs a clarification. I think it only should apply to >> inlined replaced content like the examples mentioned, not to content >> pulled in from another document. > > Sounds reasonable; given that other styles don't inherit into > <iframe>s, it would seem odd for writing-mode to magically do > so. I expect you can figure out some suitable wording here to > eliminate the potential confusion. Proposed wording: # The content of replaced elements do not rotate due to the # writing mode: images and external content such as from # iframes, for example, remain upright, and the default # object size of 300px×150px does not re-orient. However # embedded replaced content involving text (such as MathML # content or form elements) should match the replaced # element’s writing mode and line orientation if the UA # supports such a vertical writing mode for the replaced # content. Please let me know if that's sufficiently clear, or if you have any suggestions for improvement. Thanks~ ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2015 23:31:10 UTC