Re: [css-inline] Updated WD of CSS Inline Layout

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Charles Lamont <
charles@gateho.gotadsl.co.uk> wrote:

>
>
> I understand and agree with the primary motivation, but suggest the
> working draft concentrates on the original purpose a little too
> single-mindedly. I think that altering one of the section 2.3 sunken or
> raised letter examples to a non-integer size would benefit reader
> understanding by illustrating a more general case, without creating
> confusion or additional complication.
>

I've added a non-integer example to that section in the Editor's Draft [1].

Thanks!

Dave

[1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-inline/#sizing-drop-initials