W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2015

Re: i18n-ISSUE-362: [css-counter-styles] In the document language

From: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:55:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CAERejNa7g9RjpSU+PUWm57=bTeKhrx5y8SRL8WFDrjRpO+3kug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Cc: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
On 25 September 2015 at 08:51, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
>
> Hello Richard,
>
> On 2015/09/25 15:00, Richard Ishida wrote:
>
>> i think the language of the numbering should be that of the linguistic
>> context of the list as a whole, and not determined by the content of the
>> list item.
>>
>> In many cases that will quite possibly be the language of the document,
>> but in the case of, say, a bilingual document in Quebec with parallel
>> content in both english and french, or a forum with multilingual
>> responses that are language tagged, etc. then the list's linguistic
>> context may be determined by language information at the sub-document
>> level.
>
>
> That seems to be a very good point.
>
>> I can't see a justification for the content of the list item to
>> influence the pronunciation of the bullet, and i think it would be
>> confusing to readers to change the language of the numbering.
>
>
> Then let's clearly say that the language used for pronouncing the list markers/bullets/numbers is the language that applies to the overall list. "the language most recently declared" still is wrong, and that was my main point.
>
>> On 25/09/2015 02:37, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
>
>
>>> Another question: Are there languages where we need to be able to
>>> distinguish between reading numbers as ordinals and as cardinals? Or
>>> languages where there are other distinctions between numbers that may
>>> have to be made?
>>
>>
>> I suspect that there are some languages where ordinals are used rather
>> than cardinals, but i expect that in that case the audio generated by
>> the implementation would just take that into account naturally, no?
>
>
> For those languages where it's always cardinal or always ordinal, that's going to be fine. But I suspect that there are languages where that's not so clear-cut.
>
> In particular, I'm not sure whether I'd use cardinal or ordinal in German; my gut feeling is that it would depend on the nature of the list. Actually thinking about it, I get a similar feeling for English, but I'm not native, so I don't want to attach too much to that.
>
> But let's just look at two examples:
>
>
> Example 1:
>
> There are three things to remember when leaving the room:
> 1. Close the windows
> 2. Switch off air conditioning
> 3. Switch off the light
>
>
> Example 2:
>
> Recipe for a cake (very simple):
> 1. Stir the butter until soft
> 2. Add sugar and stir until absorbed by butter
> 3. Add eggs and stir until mass turns lighter in color
> 4. Add flower and stir slowly until absorbed
>
>
> I think I'd go for cardinal in example 1, but ordinal in example 2, especially in there respective German equivalents. The reason is that in example 1, we are just counting the items; their order isn't particularly relevant. But in example 2, the order is very relevant.

When you read those two lists in German, you always read them
ordinally (i.e. 'erstens', 'zweitens', 'drittens', 'viertens'). And I
assume it is similar in other languages. If you want them to be read
cardinal, you explicitly need to say so by writing them without the
dot:

1 Close the windows
2 Switch off air conditioning
3 Switch off the light

Or, if the order is not important, it may be an unordered list.

Sebastian
Received on Friday, 25 September 2015 09:56:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:57 UTC