- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 22:59:55 +0900
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> On 23 Sep 2015, at 07:21, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm currently in discussion with Alice Boxhall and Brian Kardell about > their input modalities proposal (which we discussed at the f2f), but > one thing that came out of the discussion which seemed independently > relevant is the ability to directly style the "focus ring" state. > > By "focus ring" state, I mean the subset of :focus that, in the > absence of any overriding author styles, triggers a UA focus ring. > This currently happens any time a text input or [tabindex > 0] element > is focused, and when a button is *keyboard* focused (but not when it's > clicked). > > Mozilla has something approximately equivalent today, with > :-moz-focusring > <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/%3A-moz-focusring>. > (The only difference is that it doesn't match anything if "focus ring > drawing" is turned off.) > > The main benefit of such a thing is that, today, if the default UA > focus ring style does not work well with your site's theme, you're > kinda screwed. You can manually write a :focus rule, but you can't > predict when an element would have a focus ring drawn; you'll > unfortunately start drawing focus rings when the user mouse-clicks a > button. Using :focus-ring instead does the right thing automatically, > triggering your styles only when the UA determines via heuristics that > it should draw a focus ring. > > (Those heuristics might not always be right, and that's part of my > continuing conversation with Alice and Brian, but that's separable > from this topic.) > > Thoughts? This seems to make sense. It builds off the same internal model that the input modality pseudo used, and exposes it in a syntax that is more to the point when trying to address the primary (only?) use case: the focus ring. The bit that confuses me a little is that you say "independently relevant". Do we still need the modality pseudo if we have this? - Florian
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2015 14:00:29 UTC