On 17/09/15 15:06, Peter Moulder wrote: > The following recent change to css2/syndata: > > -ruleset : selector? '{' S* declaration? [ ';' S* declaration? ]* '}' S*; > +ruleset : selector? '{' S* declaration-list '}' S*; > +declaration-list: declaration [ ';' S* declaration-list ]? > + | at-rule declaration-list > + | /* empty */; > ... > declaration : property S* ':' S* value; > > has the effect that leading semicolons and consecutive semicolons > within a ruleset block no longer conform to the core grammar. > > Is this intentional? It seems a bit late to be changing the > conformance of so common an occurrence (e.g. due to commenting > out a declaration), even if error recovery means it doesn't > make a difference to web browser behaviour. (It might also > require re-examining css2 statement of error recovery behaviour > for this case.) This is not intentional. I think it can be fixed by replacing declaration with declaration? in the definition of declaration-list. -- Simon SapinReceived on Thursday, 17 September 2015 13:28:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:57 UTC