- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 11:16:46 -0700
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
According to Fonts, CSSFontFaceRule has a few members, like "family", "style", etc. There's a note pointing to its old definition in DOM L2 Style, where it was instead defined with a "style" attribute that reflected its attributes with the standard property names like "font-family", "font-style", etc. It looks like Chrome and Firefox both implement the old DOM L2 Style definition. Can we just accept that and converge on that definition? The current spec appears to be fiction. This is important, because I purposely modeled the FontFace interface off of CSSFontFaceRule, or rather, what Fonts currently states CSSFontFaceRule should look like. If Fonts is incorrect, and we switch the definition to what browsers currently actually do, FontFace will be inconsistent, and that's not good. If I need to make a change to Font Loading, I need to do so *now*. Thoughts? ~TJ
Received on Friday, 4 September 2015 18:17:32 UTC