- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:48:22 -0500
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/22/2015 04:05 AM, Florian Rivoal wrote: > This is an answer to issue 1 (https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap/#issue-12d3b5df) > > There is a suggestion that we may need a third value besides proximity and mandatory, to say something like: stop on the next snap point in the scrolling direction even if the user flinged so hard that inertial would normally take us past it. > > I think this is a very useful distinction to make, but not as a third value. It should be a separate orthogonal property. > > [.... examples etc. ....] > > scroll-snap-stop: always | inertial Fwiw, following the TPAC discussions, Tab and I added this suggestion to our proposal as scroll-snap-stop: normal | always https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap/#scroll-snap-stop ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 24 November 2015 05:49:04 UTC