W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2015

Re: [css-scroll-snap] "single mandatory"

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:48:22 -0500
To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5653FA26.1000801@inkedblade.net>
On 10/22/2015 04:05 AM, Florian Rivoal wrote:
> This is an answer to issue 1 (https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap/#issue-12d3b5df)
>
> There is a suggestion that we may need a third value besides proximity and mandatory, to say something like: stop on the next snap point in the scrolling direction even if the user flinged so hard that inertial would normally take us past it.
>
> I think this is a very useful distinction to make, but not as a third value. It should be a separate orthogonal property.
>
> [.... examples etc. ....]
>
> scroll-snap-stop: always | inertial

Fwiw, following the TPAC discussions, Tab and I added this suggestion to our proposal as
   scroll-snap-stop: normal | always
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap/#scroll-snap-stop

~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 24 November 2015 05:49:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:29 UTC