W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2015

Re: Minutes Sapporo F2F 2015-10-26 Part II: font-weight-adjust, Box Alignment, Dev Meetup in Sydney [css-fonts] [css-align]

From: Mats Palmgren <mats@mozilla.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:25:11 +0100
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <5650D327.8080002@mozilla.com>
On 11/19/2015 02:38 AM, Dael Jackson wrote:
> Box Alignment
> -------------
>
>    - RESOLVED: All layout modes use "true" alignment by default for
>                the alignment properties.
 > [...]
>    fantasai: So is everyone fine with the current switch syntax? Or
>              just have the "safe" keyword, and make unspecified be
>              "true"?
>    dbaron: We might eventually want to apply this to text-align,
>            which defaults to "safe".
>
>    szilles: I think it's better to have authors specify what they mean.
>    fantasai: Too late for that unfortunately - the properties already
>              allow it to be omitted in implementations.
>    fantasai: [discusses serialization]
>    fantasai: If you write "true center", it'll serialize back to just
>              "center", since omitted defaults to "true".
>    TabAtkins: So per dbaron's argument, I think it's fine to leave
>               "true" here. We don't need it yet, but it'll simplify
>               merging in more alignment properties later.


It's not clear to me what was decided about serialization.
Does the above mean that "true start" should serialize to "start" now?


Thanks,
Mats
Received on Saturday, 21 November 2015 20:25:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:58 UTC