- From: Jihye Hong <jh.hong@lge.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 18:23:36 +0900
- To: "'www-style list'" <www-style@w3.org>
In the previous telecon [1], there was a discussion about animating elements with 2d rotation transform function for polar coordinates [2]. There are 2 cases when an element is not only animating but also transforming by the 2d rotation function in polar coordinates: 1. The polar-angle property is inside an animation and the 2d rotation function has 'polar-angle' or 'polar-angle-reverse' value. 2. The 2d rotation function is inside an animation. For case 1, because 'polar-angle' or 'polar-angle-reverse' value is a computed value of the polar-angle property, an element revolves around the point of origin and also rotates on the anchor point of the element if the polar-angle property is animating. The case 2 is hard to decide the element's behavior because when the polar-angle property is also inside an animation, it comes to animating something which is also animating. In this case, the function has to be animatable only as <angle>. Or if we want to use the 2d rotation function with the keyword value for animation, there would be a condition of not animating the polar-angle property. Is there any usecase of specifying animation with the limited condition? Thanks, Jihye Hong [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0226.html [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0173.html
Received on Friday, 20 November 2015 09:24:13 UTC