- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:17:42 +0900
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: Johannes Wilm <johannes@fiduswriter.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Rossen Atanassov <ratan@microsoft.com>, Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com>, "Elika J. Etemad" <fantasai@inkedblade.net>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
> On 12 Nov 2015, at 02:12, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On Nov 8, 2015, at 7:24 PM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: >> >>>> As already stated, I agree that we should probably move all floats to this spec. >>> >>> Yes, I agree too. The details from 2.1 should be revised to include the 'start' and 'end' values for inline floats. Or that 'left' always means 'inline-start'. >> >> inline-start and (line-)left are different. both mean left in english, both mean top in vertical japanese, but in horizontal arabic, left means left, while inline-start means right. > > Yes, I absolutely understand that. I was just trying to keep my comment short. I said ‘left’ always means ‘inline-start’, because even in Japanese that is what ‘left’ means, correct? In Japanese it does (for the properties that treat "left" as being "line-left"), in Arabic it doesn't. - Florian
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2015 01:18:15 UTC