W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2015

Re: [css-flexbox] max-content contribution incorrectly defined for flex items

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:07:36 -0800
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <5642CD18.8030305@inkedblade.net>
On 09/04/2015 09:00 PM, fantasai wrote:
> On 08/23/2015 07:18 AM, fantasai wrote:
>> On 08/21/2015 12:20 AM, fantasai wrote:
>>>
>>>>    https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/#intrinsic-sizes
>>>
>>> Okay, I went over this section with dholbert today, and we've
>>> concluded that the spec needs the following changes:
>>>
>>> 3. Don't floor the flex factor at 1.
>>>
>>>     [ This might be left over prose from before we had partial
>>>       flexes. ]
>>
>> Okay, I've checked in these changes, as they're really just bugfixes
>> against errors in this section.
>
> And... I think this one was incorrect. We should be flooring at one
> for the max-content flex fraction calculation, otherwise 0 to 1 is
> not continuous.

Confirmed with Tab that it should indeed be floored,
and reverted this aspect of the change.

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2015 05:08:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:28 UTC