On 7/11/15 04:14, Florian Rivoal wrote: > TL;DR: as this is unstable stuff, if you're going to ship it, you > should (RFC 2119) ship with both inline-start and -moz-inline-start, > aliased to each other (and the same thing for *-end). If you're not > happy about aliasing the more important of the two is the > non-prefixed one. I don't think aliasing would be a big deal. What concerns me more is that none of this really helps authors be future-ready in the event that the WG ends up changing 'inline-start' to 'start'. Which was what Tab & fantasai seemed to have decided a couple of days ago; but AFAICT it doesn't look like there is any real WG consensus here. JKReceived on Saturday, 7 November 2015 14:08:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:58 UTC