- From: Sergio Villar Senin <svillar@igalia.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 12:26:57 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 06/11/15 01:18, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> For #one the item takes as much height as it needs to position all the >> > text in one "column" (i.e. only obeys its auto height), but in #two the >> > item is indeed sized under min-content constraint. So, why should we >> > want to have a different behavior for grid containers? > The example doesn't show what you think it does, but actually you're > right, your original example 1 and 2 are correct per spec right now. > In your example 2, or #one (height:min-content on parent), the parent > is a block, which always treats block-axis min-content as identical to > auto, so the child never even sees a min-content constraint. Oh indeed, you're absolutely right on that, and it explains what I was observing. I knew it but I failed to join the dots :). BR
Received on Friday, 6 November 2015 11:27:41 UTC