- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 20:31:41 -0400
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: >> Why postpone :has again? it's already been booted from like 1999 to >> selectors 3, then 4, then "only for static profile" and now we want to >> move it to 5? why? in the static profile this isn't hard and jQuery >> has had it since, I think day one. > > Because we still aren't seeing implementations snapping at it. We're > prepping for CR; we don't want things in CR that nobody's planning on > implementing. fair enough. I'd feel better if any implementer could really share a good reason about why this is complex though, it seems like an easy win, I must be missing something. -- Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2015 00:32:13 UTC