- From: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:14:04 +0200
- To: Aaron Reisman <aaron@hired.com>, www-style@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Aaron, On 07/10/2015 11:24 AM, Aaron Reisman wrote: > I feel like most people would agree. > > when I say :first-child, or :last-child > > what I'm really saying is I want the ":first-visible-child" or the > ":last-visible-child" > > I don't care about elements that are "display: none" when writing > CSS. > > I'm not sure if we want to introduce these new pseudo selectors or > update the idea of what :first-child or :last-child means. > > but these definitely need to be a feature in CSS. > In the spirit of <http://w3cmemes.tumblr.com/image/121697381917>, can you tell me what happens if I write :first-visible-child { display: none; } or :first-child:not(:first-visible-child) { display: block; } ? Thanks Ms2ger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVrR5AAAoJEOXgvIL+s8n2VREIAIDK12CUgV1CCeghiB/uSzQO BfFii2ELYA+rth70sjxRI7deDpA+eUdsbh+340Dnt1YPbIA+lKykSl/ceT/7D69H F/Hmc3E7RoF4HBAUxKKYWYdiGcF9ZUYnj/7zA7RkGuTbHjE2DwQIQf8UNLvq4Iet giTW393zeDba0wXVeV/qalTO1kFbljnCgAB0lLo+zo0j7OQFQco88qXee957Uchj dak2cat/uq18j6A00C0yG4Es3+Hrl5bSKKHiH+Vqvt0+1xFzY1oGWdplEDGRFU4m IdwYYWrTwB01tARFiurrpYvrbqHruhRc0cYVL43xj6XwC5Yz+e2fTdyW0hcRAdk= =X3vm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 20 July 2015 16:14:48 UTC